← Agent Control Efficacy
Passarel Confidential · board summary

Agent Control Efficacy

The whole story —
not the part with an owner.

Prepared for[Your company]
PeriodQ2 2026
ModelPACE v1 · DDN-aligned

What the board heard last quarter

  • Phishing failure rate — 2%
  • Security training — 100% complete
  • Critical patch SLA — met
  • MFA coverage — 99%

The part with an owner.

What ACE found in your agents

  • Agents can exceed their granted scope
  • A live, exploitable vuln in an agent path
  • 30% of agent actions not reconstructable
  • 2 shadow agents nobody approved

The part no one owns.

Same quarter. Same company. Your board saw the left. ACE shows you the right — before a breach does.

Overall posture

Amber

Your controls do not yet hold against AI agents. Two domains need work before agents scale. Two are sound today.

Up from 4 red last quarter. Two domains moved since Q1.

Seven domains

1234567
2 fail 3 partial 2 hold

Exhibit A · the finding that wasn't in the deck

A dependency in one agent's tool path carried a vulnerability — flagged medium, parked in the backlog. Staris validated it as actually exploitable and reachable: an attacker reaching the agent could pivot to the records it queries. Your team saw it. Nobody owned the fix. Nobody had the time or the authority to force it. It ran against your agents — and seeing it was never the hard part.

Domain detail